Security teams have a problem. Developers hate working with them. This isn’t because developers don’t care about security. It’s because most security teams operate like they’re still living in 2005.

Imagine you need to travel from one city to another. You have two choices: hack your way through a dense forest or take a well-maintained highway. Most people would choose the highway because it’s faster, safer, and requires less effort. In cybersecurity, “Paved Roads” work the same way.

You check your vulnerability scanner and see red alerts everywhere. Critical vulnerabilities with CVSS scores of 9.0 and higher are lighting up your dashboard like a Christmas tree. Your heart rate spikes. Time to panic, right? Not so fast. Here’s something that might surprise you: a vulnerability with a CVSS score of 9.8 might be less dangerous to your systems than one scored at 6.5. The reason comes down to one simple truth - CVSS scores measure technical severity, not real-world risk.

If you work with software development and security, you’ve probably heard people talk about “guardrails” and “gates.” These two approaches help keep your code and systems safe, but they work in very different ways. Let me explain both concepts using simple terms and real examples.

Welcome, future security incident creators! Today we’ll learn the fine art of writing code so vulnerable that hackers will send you thank-you cards. Because who needs job security when you can have security vulnerabilities?